Skip to main content

Full text of "Sigillologia. Being some account of the great or broad seal of the Confederate States of America"

See other formats


Class CD  ^6(0 

x_)-l 

Book -   -■■■ 


K? 


H.S*'\* 


■*•$ 


C>  V 


w 


N0^.       I 


o  ox 


,tf 


vV5 


c5> 


, 


^0^ 


I  > 


^  ; 


??  - 


.**  ** 


/  ^ 


#^ 


'<%>  ^: 


r>> 


•^ 


oov 


<J  v        -    .       . 


'^ 


^V'      ,    ;^-^jV  ' 


■s-     ,vV 


'.     "^    / 


o  o' 


UkAAAAA  i.jt*ikA.mt.  +  *  +  +  +  ±A+±+AAAAAA^A)*A**AA 


SIGILLOLOGIA. 
BEING  SOME  ACCOUNT    . 

OF     THli 

GREAT  OR  BROAD  SEAL 

THE 

CONFEDERATE  STATES  OF  AMERICA. 

A    MONOGRAPH. 


>N  OMN  IS  MOBIAE. 

DEDICATED    TO    THE    SACRED    MBMOBY    010 

"The  gallant  died  in  vain, 

For  those  who  knew  not  to  resign  or  reign." 

BY  EOLOGOS. 

{Honi  so  talypense!) 


PBICE  25  CENTS. 

*-»-• 

WASHINGTON,  D.  C. 
Published  by  Kebvand  &  Towers. 

Printed  by  Powell  &  Ginck, 

.  032  F  Street. 
1873. 


'  ifvtyf>ff»TWTVvy??TVT»7vvvyTvvfVfTyyvir7vnryyv?vTfvtfv^yy»»*'»»<*» 


SIOILLOLOGIA.. 


BEING  SOME  ACCOUNT 

OF.    THE 

GREAT  OR  BROAD  SEAL 

OP     THE 

CONFEDERATE  STATES  OF  AMERICA. 

A   MONOGRAPH. 


XON  OMNIS  MORIAR. 
DEDICATED    TO    THE    SACKP^D    MEMORY 

"The  gallant  cavaliers  who  died  in  vain, 
For  those  who  knew  not  to  resign  or  reign.'" 

BY   IOANNES    DIDYMUS   ARCHiEOLOGOS. 

(Honi  soit  qui  mal  y  pense !) 


<jir 


PRICE  25  CENTS.  °  J 


WASHINGTON,  D.  C. 

Published  by  Kervand  &  Towers. 

Printed  by  Powell  &  Ginck, 

630,  632  F  Street. 

1873. 


r  V 


0 


THE  GREAT  SEAL 


OF     THE 


©@iiii©iM4^; 


In  Harper's  Monthly  Magazine  for  February,  1869,  there 
is  an  interesting  paper  entitled  "  The  Executive  Depart- 
ments and  Seals,"  in  which  occurs  the  following  passage  : 

"  In  our  day  the  extraordinary  spectacle  has  been  seen 
of  the  efforts  of  an  oligarchy,  small  in  numbers,  but  power- 
ful in  influence,  to  establish  another  nation  within  the 
bounds  of  the  Republic — imperiumin  imperio — and  to  give  to 
it  the  symbol  of  sovereignty  in  the  form  of  a  Great  Seal. 
The  youngest  of  us,  old  enough  to  reflect  and  reason,  have 
seen  that '  nation,'  so-called,  spring  up  from  the  late  slave- 
labor  States  which  formed  the  northern  portion  of  the  great 
golden  circle  of  empire  devised  by  conspirators.  It  was  a 
Caliban  in  features ;  barbaric  in  its  proclivities ;  awfully 
potential  in  mischievous  works ;  protesting  with  fire,  sword 
and  torture  against  the  civilization  of  the  age ;  and  yet 
impudently  insisting  upon  its  recognition  as  one  of  the 
family  of  legitimate  and  respectable  sovereignties.  Its  titu- 
lar initials  were  *  C.  S.  A.'  Its  fathers  resolved  that  it, 
like  the  nation  it  was  attempting  to  overthrow  by  internal 
convulsions,  should  have  a  Great  Seal,  and  in  *  Congress ' 
resolved,  in  the  spring  of  1863,  that  it  should  bear  '  a  de- 
vice representing  an  equestrian  statue  of  Washington 
(after  the  statue  which  surmounts  his  monument  in  the 
capitol  square  at  Richmond),  surrounded  with  a  wreath 


composed  of  the  principal  products  of  the  Confederacy, 
and  having  around  its  margin  the  words  i  Confederate 
States  of  America,  Feb.  22, 1862/  with  the  following  motto  : 

*  Deo  Vindice?  God,  the  protector,  defender,  deliverer,  or 
ruler — indicative  of  the  expected  longevity  of  the  '  nation  ' 
because  of  divine  protection  and  sustenance.     Alas !  that 

*  nation  '  so  notably  '  conceived  in  sin  and  born  in  iniquity,' 
died  of  political  and  moral  marasmus  in  its  infancy,  un- 
honored  by  any  recognition  of  its  existence  excepting  by 
a  Latin  ghost  of  sovereignty.  It  had  repeated  history*  by 
a  delay  in  providing  itself  with  the  usual  symbol  of  nation- 
ality. That  symbol— the  Great  Seal  of  the  infant  Con- 
federacy— sent  to  it  by  its  nurse,  England,  reached  the  ap- 
pointed seat  of  the  empire  of  the  '  C.  S.  A.'  just  as  its  self- 
constituted  guardians  were  flying  from  the  wrath  of  God, 
whose  protection  they  had  impiously  invoked.  The  ill- 
favored  bantling  died,  and  was  left  to  decay,  without  real 
mourners,  without  burial,  and  without  a  monument,  for 
no  true  man  desired  to  perpetuate  its  memory.  Anti- 
quaries, in  the  future,  will  search  in  vain  for  any  impres- 
sion of  an  emblem  of  sovereignty  of  the  '  C.  S.  A.'  2sone 
was  ever  made.  The  broad  seal  of  the  Republic  kindly 
covers  the  dishonored  ashes  of  that  child  of  sin." 

Although  we  cannot  but  think  the  language  of  archae- 
ology should  be  more  temperate  than  the  foregoing,  yet  it 
is  not  the  intention  of  the  writer  of  this  simple  monograph 
to  take  any  exceptions  thereto.  The  de  mortals  nil  nisi 
bonum,  is  wholly  out  of  fashion,  at  least  in  this  land,  both 
as  to  States  and  statesmen.  In  fact  an  amiable  friend  of 
the  writer  lately  published  a  newspaper  article  in  the  en- 
deavor to  prove  the  generous,  time-honored  latin  maxim 
to  be  a  delusion  and  a  snare,  or,  to  speak  after  the  Ameri- 
can manner,  a  humbug  and  a  fraud. 

Ours  be  it,  therefore,  to  show,  with  moderation  of  style, 


*An  allusion  to  the  delay  of  the  United  States  in  procuring  their 
broad  seal. 


that  the  paper  from  which  \ve  have  quoted  is  in  error  when 
it  says  "  antiquaries,  in  the  future,  will  search  in  vain  for 
any  impression  of  an  emblem  of  sovereignty  of  the  '  C.  S. 
A.'     None  was  ever  made." 

At  the  third  session  of  the  first  Congress*  of  the  Con- 
federate States  of  America,  the  uecessary  legislation  was 
had  for  the  establishing  of  a  seal,  as  follows : 

[No.  4.]  Joint  resolution  to  establish  a  seal  for  the  Confed- 
erate States. 

Resolved,  by  the  Congress  of  the  Confederate  States  of 
America,  That  the  seal  of  the  Confederate  States  shall 
consist  of  a  device  representing  an  equestrian  portrait  of 
Washington,  (after  the  statue  which  surmounts  his  monu- 
ment in  the  capitol  square  at  Richmond,)  surrounded  with 
a  wreath  composed  of  the  principal  agricultural  products 
of  the  Confederacy,  (cotton,  tobacco,  sugar  cane,  corn, 
wheat  and  rice,)  and  having  around  its  margin  the  words: 
"  The  Confederate  States  of  America,  twenty-second  Feb- 
ruary, eighteen  hundred  and  sixty-two,  with  the  following 
motto  :  "  Deo  vindice" 

Approved,  April  30,  1863.     [C.  S.  Statutes  at  Large.] 

And  thus  we  have  a  succinct  and  accurate  description  of 
that  which  symbolized  the  once  formidable  but  ephemeral 
Confederacy. 

Accordingly  the  Hon.  J.  P.  Benjamin,  Secretary  of 
State  of  the  Confederate  States,  in  l}is  dispatch  of  May  20, 
1863,  (No.  23)  to  the  lion.  James  M.  Mason,  Commissioner 
of  the  Confederate  States  near  the  government  of  Great 
Britain,  expresses  the  will  of  Congress  with  regard  to  the 
proposed  seal  in  the  following  very  judicious  and  interest- 
ing manner: 


*It  must  be  borne  in  mind  that  the  previous  and  original  Congress 
was  provisional ;  the  permanent  government  of  the  Confederate  States 
not  having  been  established  until  February  22,  1862. 


6 
[ «  No.  23.] 

"  Department  of   State, 

"  Richmond,  May  20,  1863. 

"  Hon.  James  M.  Mason, 

&c,         &c,         &c, 

"  London. 

"  Sir  : 

#  .  .#  #  *  #  *  #  # 

H  Congress  lias  passed  a  law  establishing  a  seal  for  the 
Confederate  States.  I  have  concluded  to  get  the  work  ex- 
ecuted in  England,  and  request  that  you  will  do  me  the 
favor  to  supervise  it.  You  will  receive  herewith  a  copy 
of  the  act  of  Congress  describing  the  sea],  and  a  photo- 
graphic view  of  the  statue  of  Washington.  The  photo- 
graph represents  the  horse  as  standing  on  the  summit  of 
an  obelisk,  but  in  the  seal  the  base  ought  to  be  the  earth, 
as  the  representation  is  to  be  of  a  horseman  and  not  of  a 
statue.  The  size  desired  for  the  seal  is  the  circle  on  the 
back  of  the  photograph.  The  outer  margin  will  give  space 
for  the  words  <  The  Confederate  States  of  America,  22d 
February,  1862.'  I  do  not  think  it  necessary  that  the 
date  should  be  expressed  in  words,  the  figures  22,  1862, 
being  a  sufficient  compliance  with  the  requirement  of 
the  law.  Indeed,  I*  know  that  in  the  drawing  sub- 
mitted to  the  committee  that  devised  the  seal,  the 
date  was  in  figures  and  not  in  words.  There  is.  not 
room  for  the  date  in  words  on  the  circumference  of  the 
seal  without  reducing  the  size  of  the  letters  so  much  as  to 
injure  the  effect.  In  regard  to  the  wreath  and  the  motto, 
they  must  be  placed  as  your  taste  and  that  of  the  artist 
shall  suggest,  but  it  is  not  deemed  imperative,  under  the 
words  of  the  act,  t\\'<xt  all  the  agricultural  products  (cotton, 
tobacco, sugar  cane,  corn,  wheat  and  rice)  should  find  place 
in  the  wreath.     They  are  stated  rather  as  examples.     I  am 


inclined  to  tliink  that  in  so  small  a  space  as  the  wreath 
must  necessarily  occupy,  it  will  be  impossible  to  include  all 
these  products  with  good  effect,  and  in  that  event  I  would 
suggest  that  cotton,  rice  and  tobacco,  being  distinctive  pro- 
ducts of  the  southern,  middle  and  northern  States  of  the 
Confederacy,  ought  to  be  retained,  while  wheat  and  corn 
being  produced  in  equal  abundance  in  the  United  States 
as  in  the  Confederacy,  and  therefore  less  distinctive  than 
the  other  products  named,  may  better  be  omitted,  if  omis- 
sion is  found  necessary.  It  is  not  desired  that  the  work  be 
executed  by  any  but  the  best  artist  that  can  be  found,  and 
the  difference  of  expense  between  a  poor  and  a  fine  speci- 
men of  art  in  the  engraving  is  too  small  a  matter  to  be  taken 
into  consideration  in  a  work  that  wre  fondly  hope  will  be 
required  for  generations  yet  unborn. 

•"  Pray,  give  your  best  attention  to  this,  and  let  me  know 
about  what  the  cost  will  be  and  when  I  ma}r  expect  the 
work  to  be  finished." 


Monographic  as  wre  have  designed  this  paper  to  be,  we 
cannot  refrain  from  transcribing  the  remainder  of  this  dis- 
patch of  Mr.  Benjamin,  affording,  as  it  does,  a  vivid  pic- 
ture of  those  times,  as  well  as  of  its  writer's  hopeful  and 
somewhat  credulous  nature,  and  of  his  ardent  devotion  to 
the  now  Lost  Cause.* 

"  I  am  happy  to  apprise  you  that  the  information  from 
all  parts  of  the  Confederacy  is  most  encouraging,  as  re- 
gards the  growing  crops.  In  the  more  southern  portions 
of  our  country  they  are  just  beginning  to  gather  the  wheat 
harvest,  and  no  complaint  is  heard  from  any  part  of  the 
country  of  rust  or  other  injury.     The  production  of  wheat 

*The  present  writer  is  not  one  of  those  who  expects  '  to  go  to  Mr.  Ben- 
jamin when  he  dies,'  and  although  regarding  at  the  time  and  still  re- 
garding the  undue  influence  which  he  (Mr.  B.,)  exercised  over  Mr.  Da- 
vis as  a  great  calamity  to  '  The  Cause,'  justice  requires  that  he  should 
be  vindicated  from  the  suspicion  of  unfaithfulness  to  the  Confederacy. 


8 

and  other  small  grain  will  be  very  large  this  year,  while . 
that  of  corn  will  be  enormous,  probably  enough  for  two 
year's  consumption,  unless  some  very  unexpected  and  un- 
usual calamity  shall  occur.  Our  enemies  must  find  some 
other  instrumentality  than  starvation  before  they  succeed 
in  breaking  the  proud  spirit  of  this  noble  people.  How 
it  makes  one's  heart  swell  with  emotion,  to  witness  the 
calm,  heroic,  unconquerable  determination  to  be  free,  that 
fills  the  breast  of  all  ages,  sexes  and  conditions. 

"  What  effect  may  be  produced  in  Europe  by  the  repulse 
at  Charleston  and  the  defeat  of  Hooker  is  not  now  even 
the  subject  of  speculation  among  the  people.  It  is  the 
evident  purpose  of  foreign  governments  to  accord  or  re- 
fuse recognition  according  to  the  dictates  of  their  own  in- 
terests or  fears,  without  the  slightest  reference  to  right  or 
justice,  and  we  have  thus  learned,  at  heavy  cost,  a  lesson 
that  will,  I  trust,  remain  profitable  to  our  statesmen  in  all 
future  time. 

"  We  have  now,  by  our  system  of  taxation,  so  arranged 
our  financial  affairs  as  to  be  entirely  confident  of  the  ability 
to  resist,  for  an  indefinite  period,  the  execrable  savages 
who  are  now  murdering  and  plundering  our  people,  and 
no  prospect  of  peace  is  perceptible  from  any  other  source 
than  the  growing  conviction  among  all  classes  in  the 
United  States  that  they  are  waging  a  war  as  ruinous  in  the 
present  as  it  is  hopeless  for  the  future." 

We  have  been  unable  to  find  anything  among  the  Con- 
federate archives,  from  Mr.  Mason,  in  reply  to  the  fore- 
going instructions  as  to  the  seal,  until  his  dispatch  to  Mr. 
Benjamin,  dated  London,  February  18,  1864,  wherein 
occurs  the  following  passage  : 

"  In  regard  to  the  seal,  too,  I  have  now  a  report  from 
Mr.  Foley,  who,  it  seems,  has  been  some  time  absent  from 
London.  He  says  that  the  artizan,  Mr.  Wyon,  employed 
to  engrave  it,  informs  him  that  it  will  yet  require  six 


9 

weeks  or  two  months  to  to  finish  it,  as  he  is  very  anxious 
to  bestow  upon  it  all  the  pains  so  important  a  work  de- 
mauds.  He  is  executing  it  in  silver,  (the  metal  the  state 
seals  of  England  are  executed  in)  which  offers  the  advan- 
tage of  proof  against  rust  so  often  destructive  to  seals  ex- 
ecuted in  steel. 

"  The  above  is  from  Mr.  Foley's  note  of  the  10th  instant, 
from  Dublin,  to  me  at  Paris,  He  tells  me,  further,  that 
the  cost  of  engraving  the  seal,  including  the  press  for  work- 
ing it,  will  be  eighty  guineas,  and  that  it  is  customary  in 
England  to  receive  one-half  the  amount  on  commencing 
the  work.  He  advises  that  I  should  conform,  as  it  will  at 
least  prevent  excuse  for  delay,  and  which  I  will  do  as  soon 
as  I  can  obtain  the  address  of  Mr.  Wyon." 

"We  next  hear  from  Mr.  Mason,  on  the  subject  of  the 
seal,  under  date  of  Paris,  April  12,  1864. 

Mr.  Mason  to  Mr.  Benjamin : 

"  .Before  I  left  London  I  called  on  Mr.  Wyon,  the  artist 
employed  to  make  the  Confederate  seal  referred  to  in  my 
No.  4,  and  paid  him  forty  guineas,  equal  to  forty-two 
pounds,  one-half  the  cost  of  the  seal,  in  advance,  and  ar- 
ranged that  when  it  was  ready  it  should  be  carefully  packed, 
with  the  press,  &c,  in  a  box  lined  with  tin,  and  put  in 
charge  of  Mr.  Hotze  until  it  could  be  sent  over.  He 
promised  it  should  be  ready  by  the  middle  of  May." 

We  again  indulge  in  a  little  episode  by  admitting  the 
following  illustrative  paragraph  from  the  same  dispatch  of 
Mr.  Mason  : 

"  In  regard  to  the  spurious  report  of  Mr.  Mallory,  as 
Secretary  of  the  Navy,  about  which  I  wrote  in  my  No.  5, 
Lord  Russell  took  occasion,  a  few  days  since,  to  say  in  the 
House  of  Lords,  that  since  it  was  communicated  to  him 
Mr.  Seward  had  admitted  that  it  was  a  forgery,  fabricated, 
as  he  said,  by  some  i  gentleman  '  in  New  York  !!!!!!!!!! 
i  t  i  i  I  t  i  i  i  i  i  » 


10 

We  give  the  precise  number  of  his  notes  of  exclama- 
tion. Noble  old  Virginian  !  we  fear  he  was  not  the  man 
for  that  place  and  those  times.  But  one  cannot  read  his 
dispatches  without  a  feeling  of  profound  admiration  for 
his  exalted  character. 

The  official  and  pecuniary  history  of  the  seal  ends  with 
the  following  dispatch  from  Mr.  Mason  to  Mr.  Benjamin, 
audits  appendix — being  the  bill  of  the  engraver,  amounting 
to  122  pounds  10  shillings,  equal  to  about  $700  United 
States  currency,  at  present  (July,  1873,)  price  of  gold. 
Other  appendices,  being  "  directions  tor  using  the  Great 
Seal  of  the  Confederate  States,"  we  omit,  as  they  relate  to 
a  purely  mechanical  subject: 

"  London,  July  6,  1864, 

"  24  Upper  Seymour  Street, 
"  Postman  Square. 

"  Hon.  J.  P.  Benjamin, 

"  Secretary  of  State. 

"  Sir  :  I  have  the  pleasure  to  inform  you  that  I  send  by 
Lieutenant  Chapman,  C.  S.  A.,  who  bears  this,  the  seal  of 
the  Confederate  States,  at  last  completed.  It  is  much  ad- 
mired by  all  who  have  seen  it  here,  and  I  hope  you  will 
approve  it  as  a  fine  work  of  art. 

"  The  seal  is  carefully  put  up  in  a  separate  small  box, 
and  Lieut.  Chapman  is  charged,  under  no  circumstances, 
to  run  the  risk  of  its  being  captured.  He  takes  the  route 
to  Bermuda,  via  Halifax,  to  sail  on  Saturday,  9th  instant, 
and  I  ship  through  Messrs.  Fraser,  Trenholm  &  Co.,  by  the 
steamer  that  takes  him  to  Halifax,  two  boxes  containing 
the  iron  press,  with  a  full  supply  of  wax  and  other 
materials  for  the  use  of  the  seal.  Although  not  expressly 
ordered,  in  the  difficulty  of  obtaining  these  in  the  Con- 
federacy at  present,  at  least  of  approved  quality,  I  have 
thought  it  best  to  have  them  supplied  here,  all  which  I 
hope  you  wTill  approve. 

"  The  enclosed  duplicate  bill  will  furnish  a  list  of  those 


11 

materials,  with  the  prices.     The  original  I  have  paid  and 
retain. 

"  I  have  requested  Lieutenant  Chapman  to  take  charge 
of  the  boxes  at  Bermuda,  and  to  see  to  their  safe  delivery. 
To  relieve  him  of  expenses  on  the  route,  I  have  further 
requested  Messrs,  Fraser,  Trenholm  &  Co.,  here,  if  they  can 
do  so,  to  pay  the  freight  all  the  way  to  Bermuda,  and  write 
to  Major  "Walker  at  Bermuda  to  pay  the  freight  thence  to 
the  Confederacy,  should  they  not  go  in  a  Government 
ship. 

"  Still  it  is  possible  that  some  part  of  this  may  not  be  done, 
and  I  have  accordingly  told  Lieutenant  Chapman,  should 
any  expenses  in  the  transportation  devolve  on  him,  it 
should  be  paid  promptly  at  the  Department  of  State,  which 
oblige  me  by  having  attended  to. 

"  I  have  the  honor  to  be,  &c,  &c,  &c, 

[Signed.]  «  J.  M.  MASON." 

[Duplicate  Account.] 

J.  M.  Mason,  Esq. 

To  Joseph  S.  Wyon, 
Chief  Engraver  of  Her  Majesty's  Seals,  &c, 

287  Regent  Street,  London,  W. 

1864.  July  2. — Silver  Seal  for  the  Confederate  States  of 
America,  with  ivory  handle,  box  with 
spring  lock  and  screw  press. . .     £84 

3,000  wafers 4  10 

1,000  seal  papers 7 

1,000  strips  of  parchment 18 

100  brass  'boxes 16     5 

100  cakes  of  wax 7 

100  silk  cords 6     5 

1  perforator 5 

3  packing  cases  lined  with  tin..         3 

£122  10 
By  cash,  21  March,  £42. 
Settled  by  cheque  for  balance,  6th  July,  1864. 


L.oV 


12 

The  article  in  Harper's  Magazine  from  which  we  have 
quoted,  lays  stress  upon  the  fact  that,  "  that  symbol,  the 
Great  Seal  of  the  Confederacy,  was  sent  to  it  by  its  nurse, 
England."  But  the  author  seems  to  have  forgotten  that 
in  his  paper  on  the  Great  Seal  of  the  United  States,  which 
is  in  the  same  magazine,  for  July,  1856,  he  dwells  with 
some  complacency  upon  the  fact  that  the  earlier  and  more 
enduring  symbol  was  "  invented  by  an  English  aristocrat, 
Sir  John  Prestwich."  He  will  accord  to  the  Confederates 
at  least  the  merit  of  having  "  invented"  their  own  symbol ; 
though  it  must  be  confessed  there  is  not  much  that  is 
heraldic  about  it  beyond  the  inevitable  man  on  horseback. 
And  it  will  be  noted,  that  the  Confederates  were  indebted 
to  England  solely  for  the  mechanical  execution  of  their 
Great  Seal.  We  (the  writer  speaking  as  a  quondam  Con- 
federate) should  have  been  too  happy  to  have  found  an 
alma  mater  in  old  England.     Eheu  ! 

It  may  be  not  out  of  place  here  to  observe  that  there 
are  two  faces  to  the  Great  Seal  of  the  United  States,  but 
only  the  obverse  is  used,  and,  as  in  the  case  of  the  moon, 
we  never  see  the  reverse ;  the  design  of  which  consists  of 
a  truncated  pyramid  with  the  Omniscient  eye  above ;  at 
the  base  of  the  pyramid  "  1-776  "  in  numeral  letters.  Over 
the  eye  the  words  Annuit  Coeptis,  and  underneath  all  the 
legend  Novus  Ordo  Seclorum. 


It  is  quite  germane  to  our  subject  that  we  make  some 
reference  to  the  seals  of  the  mother  country.  We  find  in 
the  Congressional  Library  a  curious  little  book  published 
just  200  years  ago.     The  following  is  its  title : 

Jus  Sigilli  or  the  Laio  of  England,  Touching  His  Majesties 
four  principal  Seales,  viz  :  the  Great  Seale,  the  Prime  Seale, 
the  Excheqer  Seale,  and  the  Signet.  Also  of  those  grand 
officers  to  whose  custody  these  Seales  are  committed. 


13 

London,  1673. 

Consecrated  to  the  Clarissimo,  Consultissimo,  Dissertis- 
simoque  Viro,  Domino  Johanni  Churchill,  In  agro  Sorn- 
ersetensi  Eqaiti  Aurato,  &c,  &c,  &c,  by  Johannes  Brydall, 
Armiger,  ac  Somersetensis. 

[We  will  now  give  the  leading  sentence  of  each  of  the 
several  chapters.] 

I.     Of  the  Great  or  Broad  Seal*  of  England. 

This  Great  Seal  is  in  the  custody  of  the  Lord  Chancel- 
lor or  Lord  Keeper,  and  there  is  a  special  officer  in  the 
High  Court  of  Chancery,  called  Sigillator,  who  hath  the 
sealing  of  writs,  and  other  things  that  pass  the  Great  Seale. 

II.     Of  the  Privie  Seal. 

Parvum  Sigillum,  the  Little  or  Petit  Seal,  after  called  Pri- 
vatum Sigillum,  the  Privie  Seal,  is  a  Seal  that  his  most  Sa- 
cred and  excellent  Majesty  useth  sometime  for  a  warrant, 
whereby  things  passed  the  Privie  Signet  and  brought  to  it 
are  sent  further  to  be  confirmed  by  the  Great  Seal  of 
England.  Sometime  for  the  strength  or  Credit  of  other 
things,  written  upon  Occasions  more  Transitory  and  of  less 
continuance  than  those  be  that  pass  the  Great  Seal. 

III.     Of  the  Exchequer  Seal. 

The  seal  belonging  to  the  Court  of  Exchequer  is  in  the 
custody  of  the  Chancellor,  of  whom  these  following  authors 
speak  thus,  &c. : 

[We  can  give  only  one,  and  choose  him  for  his  quaint- 

ness.] 

3.  Plowden:  L 'es chequer  ad  Chancellor et  Seal etles  Brief es 
usuall  en  le  Chancery  en  L'eschequer  de  seiser  le  Terre  en  tiel 
Case,  sont  pluis  antient,  que  le  Register,  ou  le  Treatise  Prce- 
rogatica  Regis. 

*It  will  be  observed  that  the  orthography  of  the  English  language  was 
not  fixed  at  that  time,  nor  is  it  at  the  present. 


14 

IV.     Of  the  Signet. 

This  Seal  is  in  the  custody  of  the  Principall  Secretary, 
as  well  for  Sealing  his  Majesties  private  Letters,  as  also 
such  grants  as  pass  the  King's  Hands  by  Bill  assigned. 
And  there  are  four  Clerks  of  the  Signet  called  Clerici 
Sif/neti,  attending  on  this  Secretary  in  their  Course,  and 
were  used  to  have  their  Dyet  at  his  table. 


Our  subject  is  not,  strictly  speaking,  connected  with 
numismatics,  but  by  referring  to  Prime's  work  on  coins, 
medals  and  seals,  (Harper  &  Brothers,  1861,)  plates  will  be 
seen  of  many  of  the  Great  Seals  of  England,  beginning 
with  William  the  Conqueror,  and  including  Magna  Carta 
John.  It  seems  that  each  succeeding  sovereign  of  that 
realm  has  his  own  broad  seal. 


The  use  of  the  seal  is  very  ancient,  almost  coeval  with 
historic  man,  for  antique  intaglii  are  found  wherever 
the  least  degree  of  art  has  nourished.  These  antiquated 
seals,  especially  Etruscan,  Grecian,  Roman,  Carthaginian, 
&c,  are  become  almost  common,  even  in  this  country,  of  late 
years,  the  more  prized,  perhaps,  by  reason  of  the  fact  that  the 
polishing  of  the  intaglio  ranks  among  the  lost  arts,  although 
there  is  now  an  artist  in  Paris  whose  work  passes  even  with 
the  virtuosi,  but  it  is  more  expensive  than  the  genuine,  ex- 
cept as  to  those  specimens  which  are  so  costly  as  to  be 
termed  "  priceless."  We  have  before  us  at  this  writing  an 
impression  from  a  head  of  Antinous,  for  which  gem  the 
owner  has  refused  $2,000  ;  and  we,  ourselves,  have  a  head 
of  Jupiter  valued  at  $500.  But  very  handsome  ones  can 
now  be  had  in  New  York,  for  $100  or  so. 


But  turn -we  now  to  high  antiquity. 


15 

From  the  "  Sabsean*  Researches  "  of  John  Landseer,t 
Fellow  of  the  Eoyal  Society,  &c,  and  engraver  to  the  King, 
a  work  published  in  London  just  fifty  years  ago,  and  for 
the  use  of  which  we  are  indebted  to  the  well-furnished 
library  of  that  Learned  Theban,  Genl.  Albert  Pike,  we 
extract  the  following  in  illustration  of  our  theme  : 


Mr.  Landseer,  in  a  letter  to  Sir  Joseph  Banks,  in  re- 
ference to  certain  cylindrical  gems  iintaglii)  disinterred  at 
Babylon  and  in  Phoenicia,  proceeds  most  satisfactorily  to 
his  reader  to  show  why  he  conceives  the  gems  to  have 
been  orignally  not  worn  as  talismans  or  amulets,  but  used 
as  signets,  that  is  to  say,  impressed  for  the  purposes  of  ratify- 
ing such  social  and  religious  transactions  as  called  for  a 
sacred  pledge. 

He  then  treats  of  them  with  reference  to  the  ancient 
customs  of  Chaldea  and  Assyria,  (Sabsean  nations  of 
course),  and  observes  that.  Herodotus,  in  detailing  those 
customs  as  they  existed  in  his  time,  says  that  every  Assy- 
rian possessed  a  signet  or  seal.  But  this  father  of  history 
does  not  inform  us  as  to  the  shape  of  the  seal,  nor  the 
manner  in    which  mounted. 

Reference  in  the  Pentateuch  to  the  engraver's  art  shows 
that  in  the  time  of  Moses,  it  was  no  recent  invention,  and 

"This  word  signifies  worshippers  of  the  stars,  and  is  applied  to  all 
those  very  ancient  nations  which  cultivated  astronomy,  deified  the  sun, 
&c. 

The  Sabacans  are  frequently  mentioned  in  the  Pentateuch,  the  book 
of  Job,  &c. 

The  charmingly  poetical  expression  of  "  Sabamn  odors  from  Araby 
the  Blest,"  refers  to  the  Arabian  town  of  Saba,  famed  for  its  aromatic 
plants.     Arabia  Felix. 

fFather  of  Sir  Edwin  Landseer,  the  celebrated  painter  of  animals, 
especially  canines,  to  whom  the  Rev.  Sidney  Smith  said,  when  asked 
hy  him  to  sit  for  his  portrait,  "  is  thy  servant  a  dog  that  he  should  do 
this  thing?"  When  Landseer  was  presented  to  the  King  of  Portugal 
that  youthful  monarch  said,  "I  am  delighted  to  make  your  acquaint- 
ance, Sir  Edwin  :  I  am  so  fond  of  beasts  !" 


1G 

that  among  the  surrounding  nations  signets  were  then  com- 
mon and  in  well-known  use. 

Joseph  us,  too,  informs  us  that  some  ages  before  the  time 
of  Moses,  when  Pharaoh  invested  the  youthful  Joseph  with 
power  over  the  land  and  people  of  Egypt,  he  entrusted  to 
his  discretion  the  use  of  the  royal  signet,  along  with  and  as 
the  ostensible  mark  of  the  royal  authority. 

The  Chaldean  progenitors  of  the  Jews  were  engravers; 
and  it  is  by  no  means  improbable — considering  the  nume- 
rous uses  to  which  the  signet  may  have  been  applied  in  a 
rude  age,  when  writing  could  have  been  practiced  but  by 
few  persons;  considering  too,  the  great  number  of  signets 
that  must  in  consequence  have  become  necessary — that 
Terah,  the  Chaldean,  the  father  of  Abraham,  and  the  first 
artist  whose  name  is  anywhere  upon  record,  was  an  en- 
graver of  signets  as  well  as  a  sculptor  or  modeller  of  such 
small  idols  as  Rachel,  in  three  generations  from  Terah,  is 
recorded  to  have  hidden  under  the  furniture  of  a  camel. 

The  dimensions  of  these  curious  antiques  are  various, 
some  being  ten  times  as  large  as  others.  Speaking  gener- 
ally, they  are  from  three-fourths  of  an  inch  to  more  than 
two  inches  in  length.  These  elaborately  wrought  instru- 
ments of  ratification,  these  pledges  of  honor  or  of  super- 
stitious faith,  were  easily  portable  and  served  as  personal 
ornaments. 

Ferdosi,  the  poet,  records  that  when  Sohrab,  the  son  of 
his  hero,  (Roostum)  had  received  his  death  wound  from 
the  hand  of  his  unknown  father,  he  tore  open  his  coat  of 
mail,  and  showed  the  seal  which  his  mother  had  placed  on 
his  arm  when  she  revealed  to  him  the  secret  of  his  birth, 
and  bade  him  seek  his  father.  "  The  sight  of  his  own 
signet  (says  Ferdosi)  rendered  Roostum  quite  frantic,"  kc. 

The  passage  in  the  Idyl  of  Solomon,  "  set  me  as  a  seal 
upon  thine  arm,"  doubtless  alludes  to  the  same  oriental 
custom,  and  is  of  a  date  between  Juclah  and  Roostum. 

"  Hast  thou  commanded  the  morning  since  thy  days  ? 


17 

Hast  thou  caused  the  day-spring  to  know  his  place,  that  it 
might  take  hold  of  the  ends  of  the  earth  ?  It  is  turned 
as  clay  to  the  seal,"  &c.     job.,  chap.  38. 

The  sealing  substances  of  the  land  of  ITz  and  probably 
that  of  the  nations  on  the  banks  of  the  Euphrates,  at  this 
remote  period,  was  clay,  the  ooze  of  that  river,  the  very 
same  substance,  levigated,  perhaps,  of  which  the  stamped 
Babylonian  bricks  are  formed  ;  and  our  instructive  author 
adds,  that  of  the  various  substances  (such  as  wax,  pastes, 
&c.,)  on  which  he  has  tried  to  impress  these  ancient  signets, 
he  has  found  clay  the  fittest  both  for  receiving  and  retain- 
ing the  impression.  The  durability  of  well-made  bricks, 
whether  burnt  in  the  fire  or  in  the  sun,  is  well  known. 

Our  excellent  author  gives  us  much  learned  discourse 
on  the  philology  of  the  nouu  signet,  and  the  verb  to  seal, 
showing  how  the  latter  came  to  be  used,  both  as  a  noun 
and  as  a  verb.  When  the  King  of  Babylon  closed  up  the 
entrance  to  the  temple  of  Baal,  and  that  of  the  den  of 
lions  to  which  the  prophet  Daniel  was  consigned,  by  ap- 
application  of  the  royal  signet, — in  the  latter  instance 
there  were  added  impressions  from  the  signets  of  his 
nobles.  The  sacred  text  also  alludes  to  the  irrevocability 
of  the  seals  of  the  Medes  and  Persians,  by  adding  "  that 
the  purpose  might  not  be  changed." 

Signet  is  from  the  same  root  and  belongs  to  the  same 
verbal  family,  with  Signal,  Ensign,  Signature,  Insignia, 
Assignment,  Signify,  Assignation  ;  and  the  root,  or  etymon, 
from  which  all  these,  with  a  long  et  cetera,  have  grown 
lies  deep,  far  deeper  than  the  later  signum,  from  which  the 
dictionaries  derive  them,  but  which  is  itself  derived,  along 
with  them,  from  the  Hebrew  root  Ath,  by  some  Hebraists 
pronounced  Oth,  but  he  believes  more  properly  Ath,  which, 
in  our  language,  is  rendered  with  sufficient  fidelity  by  the 
word  Sign.  And  by  the  expression  of  Hebrew  root,  is 
meant  that  from  which  the  idea  or  meaning,  not  the  word 
signet,  has  grown.     It  is  not  pretended  to  trace,  with  the 


18 

etymologists,  the  progress  of  a  sound  from  one  language, 
age  and  country  to  another,  but  rather  the  progress  or 
transmission  of  an  idea  from  the  primitive  ages  to  the 
present.  Anything  so  anomalous  as  that  the  English 
word  Sign  can  have  been  derived  from  a  sound  so  dissimi- 
lar as  the  Hebrew  Ath,  it  is  hoped  he  will  not  be  supposed 
to  mean.  If  our  ivord  sign  came  from  the  Hebrew  at  all, 
it  probably  came,  with  the  Greek  Sema,  from  Shem.,  which 
is  Name. 

It  may  not  be  superfluous  to  mention,  that  the  ordinary 
sense  in  which  the  names  of  common  things  are  the  ac- 
credited signs  of  those  things  is  not  here  treated  of,  nor 
of  that  other  branch  of  the  meaning  of  Shem,  which  the 
English  word  Notoriety  would  best  express,  but  more  re- 
conditely,  of  mystic  signs,  prophetic  of  the  future,  or 
emphatically  denoting  the  past. 

Ath  or  Sign,  then,  primarily  meant  and  still  means — 
What  ?  A  mystic  mark,  denoting  and  bringing  to  mind 
something  absent,  or  some  material  essence  intellectually 
apprehensible,  but  not  cognizable  by  the  senses. 

To  this  family  of  words  (Signal,  Ensign,  etc.),  then 
belongs,  and  from  this  genealogical  root  springs  the  word 
Signet.  Its  termination  et  meaning  no  more  in  the  abstract 
than  advancement  to  the  accomplishment  of  a  pur- 
pose intended,  which  purpose,  in  the  present  case,  is  the 
manifestation  of  the  sign  ;  or  else  this  termination  is 
merely  a  diminutive,  like  the  ette  of  the  French,  in  which 
case  signet,  or  signette,  can  mean  no  other  than  literally  a 
miniature  sign. 

It  is  well  known  that  our  Saxon  ancestors,  soon  after 
the  introduction  of  Christianity,  when  few  men  were  clerks 
enough  to  execute  a  written  deed  by  the  subscription  of 
their  names,  were  accustomed  instead  thereof,  as  illiterate 
persons  do  at  present,  to  sign  with  a  cross;  of  which  it 
may  be  said  either  that  they  made  the  mystic  sign  of  the 


19 

cross,  or  that  the  cross   which  they  made  was  the  sign* 
of  their  plighted  faith. 

[Another  entertaining  work,  Oriental  Fragments,  by 
the  author  of  the  Hindu  Pantheon,  London,  1834,  says : 

The  impressions  of  seals  or  rings,  which  I  suppose  may 
be  called  signets,  were  in  days  of  yore  extensively  applied 
in  lieu  of  manual  signature.  In  such  days  it  was  not  usual 
for  any  but  the  clergy  to  learn  to  write  or  read.  Not 
many  centuries,  say  four  or  five,  have  elapsed  since  read- 
ing and  writing  were  in  England  deemed  ungentlemanly 
acts.  Those  must  have  been  glorious  days  for  the  rev- 
erend clergy.] 

During  the  middle  ages  when  the  profession  of  arms 
was  regarded  as  the  only  pursuit  worthy  of  a  gentleman, 
and  learning  was  mostly  confined  to  the  ecclesiastical 
orders,  it  was  looked  upon  as  an  effeminacy  flbr  men  to 
know  how  to  write  their  names ;  and  this  habit  of  thought 
lasted  among  the  French  noblesse  long  after  the  art  of 
printing  had  disseminated  intelligence  amongst  the  middle 
classes.  Even  as  late  as  1789  a  deed  is  of  record  in 
France  signed  by  a  member  of  a  noble  family  with 
his  +  mark,  to  which  the  Scribener  has  added  as  explana- 
tion :  "  Cannot  write  his  name  for  too  much  nobility." 

To  resume  Landseer :  That  mark  of  the  cross  was  the 
ordinary  mode  of  signature  among  the  Anglo  Saxon 
Christians,  who  were,  with  regard  to  their  inability  to 
write,  in  the  predicament  of  most  of  those  Sabseans  of 
old,  whose  signets,  or  instruments  of  signing  we  are 
about  to  consider,  and  some  of  whom  lived,  in  all  proba- 
bility before  writing  was  invented. 


♦Thus,  John  (his  f  mark)  Smith,  and  hence,  from  the  form  of  that 
mark,  the  popular  error  as  to  the  meaning  of  the  expression  to  sign 
one's  name,  as  though  it  were  derived  from  the  sign  of  the  cross. 


20 

In  the  dark  ages,  which  succeeded  the  overthrow  of  the 
Roman  power,  not  only  few  men  could  write,  but  there 
were  no  artists  capable  of  cutting  seals ;  signature  with 
the  cross  was  therefore  among  the  Christians,  in  a  great 
degree,  a  thing  of  necessity,  though  they  sometimes  made 
use  of  other  ceremonies  as  signs  or  tokens.  But  when 
art  began  to  reappear,  and  engraved  stones  to  be  raked 
up  from  the  ruins  of  past  ages,  sealing  was  added  ;  and  as 
writing  gradually  became  more  known  and  practised, 
subscription  of  names  came  also  into  vogue,  introduced  at 
first,  perhaps,  by  learned  clerks,  and  by  way  of  noting 
whose  signature  had  ratified  the  deed  that  might  be  in 
question,  for  even  Charlemagne  was  not  penman  enough 
to  subscribe  his  own  name,  but  was  accustomed  to  sign 
with  an  antique  gem,  which  had  been  set  for  that  purpose 
in  the  pommel  of  his  sword,  saying,  as  he  impressed  it, 
"  what  I  sign  with  the  hilt  I  will  defend  at  the  point  of 
my  sword." 

But  it  ought  to  be  noted  here  that  regal  signets,  used 
as  instruments  of  authority  in  the  signature  of  public 
edicts,  appear  to  have  crept  into  use  after  the  age  of  Solo- 
mon,* and  perhaps  from  the  time  when  the  monarchical 
power  of  Saul  was  superinduced  on  the  republic  of  Moses. 
Whether  they  contained  celestial  signs,  or  more  than 
verbal  inscriptions  of  the  names  and  office  of  the  kings,  is 
nowhere  recorded,  but  with  one  of  these,  Jezebel  appears 
to  have  signed  her  forged  letters  to  the  elders  ;  and  in  the 
time  of  the  prophet  Jeremiah,  very  particular  mention  is 
made  of  another  signet,  used  as  an  instrument  of  legality 
in  the  purchase  of  a  field,  from  which  it  would  appear  to 
have  been  the  custom  of  the  Hebrew  conveyancers  in  the 


*We  have  been  unable  to  ascertain  why  the  cabalistic  star  com- 
posed of  two  equilateral  triangles  interlaced  thus  ^*g  should  be  called 
"the  Seal  of  Solomon  ;"  much  less  why,  having  six  angles,  it  should 
be  called  npentacle,  i.  e.  pentagon,  as  though  it  had  but  five  angles. 
[See  the  Ingoldsby  Legends.    A  Lay  of  St.  Dunstan.] 


21 


reign  of  Zedekiah  to  deposit  a  sealed  copy  of  every  deed 
of  transfer  of  landed  property  in  some  public  office. 

We  here  reluctantly  take  leave  of  our  most  fascinating 
author,  having  extracted  some  of  the  the  most  apposite 
passages  from  thirty-four  pages  quarto  of  the  original. 

But  we  hear  our  impatient  readers  exclaim,  what  about 
that  particular  seal  with  the  name  of  which. your  so-called 
monograph  is  headed  ?     Kind  friends,  read  on  : 

The  Great  Seal  of  the  Confederate  States. 

To  Col.  Charles  C.  Jones,  jr.,# 

Attorney  and  Counsellor  at  Law, 

*l  Wall  street,  New  York. 

My  Dear  Sir  :  At  considerable  trouble  and  expense,  I 
have  been  so  fortunate  as  to  rescue  this  interesting  memo- 
rial from  oblivion,  and,  possibly,  a  vandalic  melting  pot 
(it  is  of  pure  silver,  and  weighs  several  pounds).  I  have  had 
many  electrotype  impressions!  of  it  executed,  and  in  defer- 
ence to  your  antiquarian  and  archaeological  tastes  and 
devotion  to  the  Lost  Cause,  have  the  pleasure  of  handing 
you,  herewith,  the  first  one  finished,  which  you  may  regard 
as  a  proof-impression  before  letters. 

'  My  object  has  been  two-fold;  first,  to  afford  many  of  our 
compatriots  an  opportunity  of  possessing  and  holding  in 
memoriam  the  fac  simile  of  so  unique  and  charming— in 
spite  of  so  many  sad  recollections — a  souvenir,  for  which 
purpose  they  will  be  offered  for  sale ;  and,  second,  to  use 
the  proceeds  of  the  sale,  less  bare  cost  of  the  medals,  cases, 
&c,  in  the  relief  of  as  many  as  possible  of  the  needy  and 

♦Author  of  '•'  Monumental  Remains  of  Georgia  ;"  "Historical  Sketches 
of  the  Chatham  Artillery  during  the  Confederate  Struggle  for  Inde- 
pendence ;"  wk  Antiquities  of  the  Southern  Indians,  particularly  of  the 
Georgia  Tribes;"   <fcc.  &e. 

fVery  skillfully  and  faithfully  executed  by  Mr.  S.  H.  Black,  No.  4. 
Marion  street,  New  York. 


22 


afflicted  of  the  South,  whose  name,  alas!  is  legion.  And 
with  this  motive  I  beg  you  to  suggest  the  name  of  some 
one  in  Savannah  and  in  Augusta  who  would  be  willing  to 
assist  me,  as  agents,  in  this  benevolent  sigiltary  under- 
taking. 

With  much  regard,  your  friend,  &c, 


New  York,  June  20,  1873. 

And  where  is  that  Seal  ?  It  is  in  the  possession  of  the 
writer  of  this  paper.  Who  rescued  it?  And  to  whom 
does  it  belong  ?  We  reserve  a  reply  to  these  questions 
for  another  occasion.  Suffice  it  to  say,  at  present,  detur 
digniori. 


P.  S. 

We  give  the  fac  simile  of  Harper's  wood-cut  illustra- 
tion of  the  Broad  Seal  of  the  Confederate  States,  which 
is  not  half  the  diameter  of  the  original,  but  otherwise 
tolerably  correct,  by  way  of  frontispiece  to  our  brochure, 
they  having  kindly  sent  us  an  electrotype  of  the  same.  We 
would  add  that  the  writei  in  Harper  is  mistaken  when  he 
says  "  antiquaries,  in  the  future,  will  search  in  vain  for  any 
impression  of  an  emblem  of  sovereignty  of  the  Confederate 
States  of  America.  None  was  ever  made."  The  truth  is 
there  were  several  documents,  which  went  abroad,  authen- 
ticated with  it,  also  a  i'ew  impressions  given  to  officials, 
clerks  and  others. 

We  trust  that  the  loyal  heart  of  the  North,  which  was 
so  accutely  sensitive  to  the  sight  of  the  Confederate  gray 
shortly  after  the  war,  will  not  be  distressed  by  the  exhibi- 
tion of  this  symbol  of  the  long  extinct  Confederacy — cere 
perennius  though  it  be.  Fait  Ilium!  The  alert  fammam. 
is  no  part  of  our  motive. 


23 


And  we  trust  to  be  excused  for  indulging  in  this  pleas- 
ant task,  jn  the  use  of  the  first  person  plural.  This  trea- 
tise was  designed  as  a  newspaper  editorial,  but  it  has  grown 
to  an  inordinate  length  for  such  purpose.  The  writer  is 
not  unmindful  of  the  fact  that  Prentice,  of  the  Louisville 
Journal,  once  said,  "  no  man  has  the  right  to  speak  of 
himself  as  'we,'  unless  he  be  a  king,  an  editor,  or  have  a 
tape-worm." 

These  medals  of  the  Great  or  Broad  Seal  of  the  late 
Confederate  States  are  now  ready  for  delivery  to  such 
persons  as  may  desire  to  possess  a  specimen.  They  are 
finished  in  gold,  silver  and  bronze  (i.  e.  gilt,  plated,  &c.) 
price  live  and  seven  dollars  each — according  to  the  cost  of 
the  cases  in  which  mounted.  Orders  will  be  received  by 
Messrs.  M.  W.  Gait,  Brother  &  Co.,  Jewellers,  No.  1107 
Pennsylvania  Avenue,  Washington,  D.  C. 

N.  B.  They  will  not  be  furnished  for  speculative  pur- 
poses ;  but  to  Charitable  Institutions  at  half  price — being 
about  prime  cost.  The  number  executed  is  limited.  A 
statement  shall  be  published  of  the  number  distributed, 
and  of  the  disposition  made  of  the  surplus  proceeds. 

Washington,  I).  C,  July,  1873.. 


--* 


^  ^ 


w-"*    °     \v      ■'*-     °   ■'     ^    '1  ->      - 


vN     ,'  ..>^^>h.  -      ' 


A\N       »  v  '  fl  * 


\v 


*>.    » 


%  # 

V  f 


*;/■ 


\'V  °/  AU 


%  ' 


</>  «? 


*     -P 


n--l, '.'-  ?■ '" ,." 


w°° 


,0o. 


^  ^ 


,^-V 


^      - 


,00. 


o  <y 


^o1 


o* 


"V.  \V  ',/•         A 


^> 


'>  <v    : 


, 


,00 


•-        -•    v,l  .=       .?>     U,